Dear Editor:
Professor Hunt's letter in the Jan. 26 issue of Dateline raises an excellent question, if I may paraphrase: "How may a whistleblower be assured that his or her complaint will receive an unbiased review if the complaint concerns the locally designated official or his supervisors?"
The university's whistleblower policy (see ucwhistleblower.ucop.edu/policy.html) addresses this issue by providing alternative paths for complaints such as these. If a whistleblower complaint concerns the locally designated official, the provost and executive vice chancellor, or the chancellor, it should be directed to:
Bruce Darling
Senior Vice President
Office of the President
University of California
1111 Franklin Street
Oakland, CA 94607
If the complaint concerns Senior Vice President Darling, it should be directed to the university auditor:
Patrick Reed
University Auditor
Office of the President
University of California
1111 Franklin Street
Oakland, CA 94607
A whistleblower may direct his or her complaint outside of the university to a state government official:
Bureau of State Audits
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
(800) 952-5665
Bob Loessberg-Zahl
assistant executive vice chancellor
Media Resources
Clifton B. Parker, Dateline, (530) 752-1932, cparker@ucdavis.edu